The major NFC game in the vikings playoff hopes is the Tampa bay-New Orleans game, that game is the only game this week in the NFC that has to go a certain way other than Minnesota winning obviously. Keep in mind since Carolina beat the redskins it keeps the saints/panthers in playoff contention (They're not getting there, but point being have something to play for.)
So the saints have a real reason to try and beat the buccaneers this week. On to the decode.
The Buccaneers are 19-30 all-time against the saints so they're playing for their twentieth win or their 31st loss.
It will be their 50th game H2H (Drew=50 O) (Saints are in 50th season)
The game is on 12/24/2016:
'December'=37 R (Tampa Bay=37 R) (Drew Brees is 37 years old) (Winston could get his 17th loss, 'Seventeen'=37 R) 'December Twenty Fourth'=250 O, 'Buccaneers'=25 R, Buccaneers could get 250th all-time win on Saturday.
'December Twenty Fourth'=97 R, Winston could improve to 9-7 on the road)
12/24/2016 = 12+24+20+16 = 72
12/24/2016 = 12+24+2+0+1+6 = 45 (New Orleans=45 R) ('Drew Brees'=45 R) ('Bucs'=45 O)
12/24/2016 = 1+2+2+4+2+0+1+6 = 18
12/24/2016 = 12+24+16 = 52 (Christmas Eve=52 R) (Sean Payton is 52 years old)
The buccaneers could receive their 393rd all-time loss (Colts=393 English gematria, colts may play the vikings so it would be fitting to help the vikings with a colts numerical connection)
The score of the last match-up between the saints and the buccaneers:
Bucs won 16-11 ('Eleven'=27 R/45 V-exception)
The Bucs played the saints 13 days ('Drew Christopher Brees'=112 R/130 S-exception) ('Sean Payton'=130 O)previous from their upcoming match-up:
'Thirteen'=45 R 99 O ('Drew Brees'=45 R, date numerology of 45, 'New Orleans'=45) ('Drew Brees'=99 O)
This game comes 13 days before Jameis Winston's next birthday:
Again 13 connects back to New Orleans and Drew Brees.
Sean Payton has 93 career wins:
This means he is looking for his 94th win:
The Buccaneers seem like a fitting opponent to get your 94th win against.
The vikings need this game to make the playoffs and the saints have a lot of favorable coding so I think they will win this one. Carolina didn't have a lot of favorable coding and they beat Washington so I think the Saints get the job done.
Panthers over falcons?
ReplyDeleteI was referring to how Carolina won against Washington in the post, but they could win, depends on what seed the falcons are meant to get, if falcons end up tied with lions depends on who each team lost to in the final weeks. I see panthers winning week 17 against tampa so if they lose this week, then they'd be 7-9 on the season. 'champion'=79, last year they were the nfc champions.
DeleteAt this point, it seems like numerical coding and Gematria don't mean anything.
ReplyDeleteWashington, by all coding, should have defeated Tampa Bay.
Despite that, I didn't feel good about Washington winning at all, because it would have eliminated MINNY too early.
No more betting for me on the NFL. Now, I will just sit back, relax, and watch the script play out until it resolves itself.
All my bets are set on the Vikings/Colts. If it was meant to happen, and we read it correctly, then happy days.
If not, I will be crying in my soup, and there will be great wailing and anguish in my home.
No matter what happens, it has been one hell of a ride.
Good post, but this is why I still feel good about Vikings/Colts. Im taking it step by step at this point.
DeleteCarolina beating Washington was very important, now Washington can beat Chicago, and lose at New York Week 17. Exactly what we needed. Lets see if it happens
Dolphins or bills?
ReplyDeleteBills are the better team, aren't using a backup qb and keeps colts wildcard hopes alive if dolphins lose last 2 along with ravens/broncos.
Deleteplus I think the nfl would rather have baltimore/denver/indy in the playoffs over a team with a backup qb starting in the playoffs.
DeleteGreat job! Thanks for your work.
ReplyDeleteI just cant see two afc south teams making it.
ReplyDeletei agree titans just need to get beat and jags are do for a win..
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete